1) I have never had a slightest thought
to push a new guy out of the
'subculture'. My intention was obvious,
if someone put his Ch-III lpb on the
group board, others would think that
someone just announced his world record.
If you realized that you made a mistake,
why didn't you tell the group to avoid
misunderstanding. We do such kind of
mistakes many times. (We make 'Oops'
message after that.)
2) I don't have any clique here. The
problem is that one person is so
difficult to accept others' opinions.
Donald published your levels to the
group because he was so sure about
others' opinions.
3) Do not blame the group for having
too much pride, too much ego. Who has
the big ego? If someone has gifted
daughter, you would say, "My daughter
is . . . as well." It's what you wrote
in your email:
"I would like to clarify something that
I may not have expressed clearly. The
moderator, upon receiving my levels
said that he gave them to his 9 year
old daughter, and she solved them all
without having to restart. My point of
contention with that, is that the
moderator is obviously a brilliant man,
and therefore, his daughter is probably
gifted, as my 6 year old is as well. In
fact, my daughter solves puzzles deemed
"medium" all the time. But just because
my daughter solves mediums, this would
not prompt me to change them to a "kids"
rating. My other point is that the term
"kids" is too broad. I made a fun level
for my other daughter to play (4 years
old) and it was rejected because it was
too easy. Well that's the point!"
Reading that, I wanted to stop the
'misunderstanding', I wrote the options.
(Accept or Modify.) Tina agreed with the
options I wrote. But, you continued. So,
I offered the examples of modifications.
Etc.
4) Too many super-puzzle-solvers? I
don't know. I'm not a good solver. I
keep thinking, "How those GHS hunters
do that?"
5) I'm very sorry to all other members
of the group. I promise not to continue
this case.
Bye,
Suyono
Geo wrote:
to push a new guy out of the
'subculture'. My intention was obvious,
if someone put his Ch-III lpb on the
group board, others would think that
someone just announced his world record.
If you realized that you made a mistake,
why didn't you tell the group to avoid
misunderstanding. We do such kind of
mistakes many times. (We make 'Oops'
message after that.)
2) I don't have any clique here. The
problem is that one person is so
difficult to accept others' opinions.
Donald published your levels to the
group because he was so sure about
others' opinions.
3) Do not blame the group for having
too much pride, too much ego. Who has
the big ego? If someone has gifted
daughter, you would say, "My daughter
is . . . as well." It's what you wrote
in your email:
"I would like to clarify something that
I may not have expressed clearly. The
moderator, upon receiving my levels
said that he gave them to his 9 year
old daughter, and she solved them all
without having to restart. My point of
contention with that, is that the
moderator is obviously a brilliant man,
and therefore, his daughter is probably
gifted, as my 6 year old is as well. In
fact, my daughter solves puzzles deemed
"medium" all the time. But just because
my daughter solves mediums, this would
not prompt me to change them to a "kids"
rating. My other point is that the term
"kids" is too broad. I made a fun level
for my other daughter to play (4 years
old) and it was rejected because it was
too easy. Well that's the point!"
Reading that, I wanted to stop the
'misunderstanding', I wrote the options.
(Accept or Modify.) Tina agreed with the
options I wrote. But, you continued. So,
I offered the examples of modifications.
Etc.
4) Too many super-puzzle-solvers? I
don't know. I'm not a good solver. I
keep thinking, "How those GHS hunters
do that?"
5) I'm very sorry to all other members
of the group. I promise not to continue
this case.
Bye,
Suyono
Geo wrote:
>
> Is this an attempt to run the new guy out of town?
> By the way, after I sent it to the group, I realized
> that I should have sent it to Donald, so I did, along
> with another one.
>
> Too much pride in this group, too much ego, too much
> of a clique.
> Too many super-puzzle-solvers
>