Hi Steve:
Is it a coincidence that the factors in Mike's level look rather good?
Mike's:
M = (12*12+(15+12*12+7)*13) * (11*12+13)*22
Counting the highest order only:
M ~ 12 * 12 * 13 * 11 * 12 * 22. (See!)
A column or a row has 16 squares, so the factors are good, aren't they?
(Meanwhile 22 = 24 - 2 is the number of shots by anti-tank from 'down
under'.)
The current poll was too obvious. (Only two voters: the author and one
reviewer.) Now, only the last option is selectable.
The poll must be revised:
1) Conclude on January 1, 2005,
2) Number of moves, options: a) N<8m, b) 8m<=N<9m, c) 9m<=N<10m, d)
N>=10m. m=million(s). Or, something like that.
Bye,
Suyono
Steve wrote:
Is it a coincidence that the factors in Mike's level look rather good?
Mike's:
M = (12*12+(15+12*12+7)*13) * (11*12+13)*22
Counting the highest order only:
M ~ 12 * 12 * 13 * 11 * 12 * 22. (See!)
A column or a row has 16 squares, so the factors are good, aren't they?
(Meanwhile 22 = 24 - 2 is the number of shots by anti-tank from 'down
under'.)
The current poll was too obvious. (Only two voters: the author and one
reviewer.) Now, only the last option is selectable.
The poll must be revised:
1) Conclude on January 1, 2005,
2) Number of moves, options: a) N<8m, b) 8m<=N<9m, c) 9m<=N<10m, d)
N>=10m. m=million(s). Or, something like that.
Bye,
Suyono
Steve wrote: