I'm not sure if I'm right. As far as I
know, all the LT rules are consistent
(although some of us consider some of
the rules are illogical.)
About anti-tank: 1) Only one anti-tank
can shoot at one time, so if the laser
beam is still traveling, no other
anti-tank or the same anti-tank can
shoot. 2) If two or more anti-tanks see
the tank at the same time, the anti-tank
with the highest shooting priority will
shoot. (The order is: Right, Left, Lower,
and Upper Anti-tanks.)
Because of this priority, some moves
that work for one condition may FAIL
if we ROTATE the board 90 degrees. See
the attachment "5-safes-and-1-dead.lvl".
(In two ways: "Zip file attachment" and
"Text-Converted text data".)
I'm not sure if I'm answering correctly.
Bye,
Suyono
-----BEGIN FILE-----
File : 5-safes-and-1-dead.zip
Comments : Decode this B64 text using
Text-Converter.exe ver 1.03 or 1.04,
then unzip it to get
5-safes-and-1-dead.lvl.
Size : 449
-----BEGIN PACKED DATA-----
MDAxNjUtc2FmZXMtYW5kLTEtZGVhZC56aXAwM0I2
RTNCNFBLAwQUAAAACAAaAsQwDzU8bjMBAABAAgAA
FgAAADUtc2FmZXMtYW5kLTEtZGVhZC5MVkxtj81P
wkAQxWuzgdqEu8d3E5LS2KAGe0Ks0SgYAnrwuMAC
DWa32S5+/PfOLmCgcZrdzm/m9eU1YN5hnfh0HY3Y
MYcVZhUOKuyfVfTuOeCwwuyPmfMO2D6Cbb1ezy0C
K6sR+7Y5rfl9Gvp1ttU7QVbPaB9s3Vh/52fzeNvY
rq5Q8oUo0UaCueBzNEsh8JhL07LrCS1T9JMID3SG
dEbu3YkbYUbyFMMutY3wVUELPlvZXYp7aYTGS0La
yUopg02B5HsPH2JhHA7Vp3BEFmNluBG4uaAYSy1E
meKOy3Ozt+1iKmZ8UwqoBUrrk8slCp0rnZsfNMf5
cmUiDMiNbvUldAQu53grCopyK03eNlyuy7jVCEe7
r1I8Jx1QCE2xLyNMNwaD7m5wHdP/vyupkEs8rU3s
/Ve/UEsBAhQAFAAAAAgAGgLEMA81PG4zAQAAQAIA
ABYAAAAAAAAAAQAgALaBAAAAADUtc2FmZXMtYW5k
LTEtZGVhZC5MVkxQSwUGAAAAAAEAAQBEAAAAZwEA
AAAA=
-----END FILE-----
Michael Jackson wrote:
>
> Thanks Suyono for that explanation yet it still didn't answer part of
> my question---why is it that to solve some other levels you can walk
> up to an antitank covered flag and not get shot but indeed win? What
> dictates this rule that sets the principle of weather you get shot or
> not? I can't think of the other levels that allow you to do this
> without tankmover, ice or thin ice being involved but I do know they
> are there.
>
> Mick.